Mental Health Recovery Oriented Care: Operationalizing Recovery Oriented Systems

Mental Health Recovery Oriented Care: Operationalizing Recovery Oriented Systems

Mental Health Recovery Oriented Care: Operationalizing Recovery Oriented Systems CE Course Objectives and Outline:

Course Objectives:

1. Describe at least one difference between mental health recovery oriented care and substance abuse recovery oriented care.
2. Discuss at least one characteristic of person centered treatment and treatment planning.
3. Identify at least two barriers to successful mental health recovery oriented care.
4. Define at least two essential elements in providing mental health recovery oriented care.

Course Outline:

1. About BRSS TACS
2. Barriers to Operationalizing Recovery-Oriented Systems
3. Models for Implementation
4. Summary of Proceedings
   1. Mapping Recovery-Oriented Systems: Determining the Essential Operational Elements of Recovery-Oriented Systems
   2. Perspectives from the recovery community on creating recovery-oriented systems
   3. State and Local Recovery-Oriented Systems of Care Initiatives
5. Future Directions: Operationalizing the Essential Ingredients of Recovery-Oriented Systems
6. Conclusion
7. References
8. Appendix 1: Participants
9. Appendix 2: Expert Panel Agenda
10. Appendix 3: Additional Resources

Other Information:

• Table 1 – Common Characteristics Under a Recovery Vision
• Table 2: Philosophical and Historical Differences across the Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Systems

Instructors: Nicole Hiltibran, MA, LMFT; Julie Campbell, Phd

Author: SAMHSA

Acknowledgements
This summary of proceedings and policy and practice guidelines meeting report was co-authored by Kelly Stengel, Edye Schwartz, and Chacku Mathai. Thanks also to Ann Winger, Lee Chapman, and Cathy Crowley of JBS International who worked on the background paper for this meeting. Special thanks go to the Center for Social Innovation team, especially Jeff Olivet,
Livia Davis, Cheryl Gagne, Rebecca Stouff, Kathy Hanlon, and Steven Samra. Additionally, the BRSS TACS team would like to thank Cathy Nugent, Deepa Avula, and Marsha Baker for their guidance and support of this project. Finally, a very special thanks to all Expert Panel participants for working together to assure that recovery-oriented systems of care are developed not in
name only, but that they are based on a solid foundation of the guiding principles and values of recovery and include integrated, person-centered, recovery-based, and culturally competent services.

.2 of the 2.0 units may be used toward ethics

Click here to return to Aspira Continuing Education’s Home page of CE/CEUs for MFTs, Social Workers, Professional Counselors and Interns

You may also be interested in:

Mental Health Recovery Oriented Care: Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care

LMFT, mft, lpc, lpcc, LCSW, lsw, CA BBS, online ce/ceus, board approved, mental health ce courses, online ce/ceus, ce/ceus for MFTs, ce courses for counselors, Social Worker CEs, continuing education units for LPCs, MHC ce/ceus, LCSW, ASW and MFT Intern ce/ceus, state and national Board approved ce/ceus in many states, national board approval ce/ceus, alcohol and drug abuse counselor CEs.  See chart below for your state and license.

Aspira Continuing Education has been approved by NBCC as an Approved Continuing Education Provider, ACEP No. 6416. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. Aspira Continuing Education is solely responsible for all aspects of the programs.