Digital Professionalism for Mental Health Practitioners: Ethical Public Communications, Technology Relationships, and Privacy Protection (Module 8) (off-site content) – Online CE Course
PLEASE READ: This course is an offsite online program by ZynnyMe and has a separate cost in addition to the units purchased with Aspira CE. This course is just one module of a multi-module program titled Business School for Therapists. When you click on the “Enroll in Course” button below you will be redirected to the ZynnyMe site to enroll, pay for, and complete all of the modules in their Business School for Therapists program (modules can not be purchased individually). You can then return to this site to complete the exam for each module, pay for your units, and earn your certificate of completion for CE.
***If this program is full you can get on the interest list for when the doors open next by clicking on the “Enroll in Course” button below and then clicking on the “Get On The Interest List Now” button on the Business School for Therapists page.
Digital Professionalism for Mental Health Practitioners: Ethical Public Communications, Technology Relationships, and Privacy Protection Course Objectives, Description, and Outline
Course Objectives:
- Differentiate ethical requirements for public statements and advertising across major professional standards (APA, NASW, AAMFT, ACA, American Psychiatric Association) and explain how these obligations extend to third-party digital representations.
- Apply an ethics-based platform affiliation due-diligence framework to identify risks involving privacy and confidentiality, informed consent, jurisdictional licensure compliance, and conflicts of interest.
- Evaluate mental health applications and digital tools using a structured assessment protocol addressing privacy and security, clinical appropriateness, transparency and consent mechanisms, and crisis safeguards.
- Identify at least five deceptive or misleading digital communication patterns (including outcome guarantees, overbroad privacy claims, and algorithmic matching promises) and revise them into ethically defensible professional language.
- Draft digital informed consent addendum language covering online tracking technologies, platform data handling practices, and limits of confidentiality in technology-mediated care.
Course Description:
Mental health practitioners today operate in a digital environment that creates ethical obligations far beyond the traditional therapy room. From therapy platforms that may misrepresent matching capabilities or share client data without meaningful consent, to website tracking tools that inadvertently disclose sensitive information, to mental health applications with concerning artificial intelligence provisions buried in Terms of Service—the digital landscape presents risks that most training programs never addressed.
This continuing education program provides a comprehensive, applied examination of practitioners’ ethical responsibilities in four critical domains: accepting roles with mental health platforms and technology companies, hiring third-party communications contractors, evaluating mental health applications and digital tools, and creating ethically sound professional digital presences through websites, directory profiles, and social media.
Drawing on enforceable ethical codes from the American Psychological Association, National Association of Social Workers, American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, American Counseling Association, and American Psychiatric Association, the course demonstrates how foundational professional obligations—truthfulness, competence, informed consent, and confidentiality—extend directly into digital contexts. Real-world regulatory enforcement actions, including the Federal Trade Commission’s $7.8 million action against BetterHelp for unauthorized sharing of consumers’ sensitive mental health data, and allegations documented in class action litigation are used as applied ethics case examples throughout.
Participants will not only learn to identify ethical risks but will leave with practical, immediately usable tools: a platform affiliation due diligence checklist, a structured mental health app assessment protocol, a digital informed consent addendum template, a contractor contract provisions checklist, and a quarterly digital presence audit framework. Six required applied exercises ensure participants can translate course concepts directly into practice.
Course Outline:
- Section 1: Course Overview and Required Disclosures
- Course information and credit calculation rationale
- Grievance policy
- Learning objectives
- Required disclosure statement
- Accuracy, utility, and empirical/regulatory basis
- Limitations and controversies
- Note on evolving HHS OCR online tracking guidance
- Common and severe risks
- Educational disclaimer (not legal advice)
- Conflict of interest and commercial support disclosures
- Section 2: Introduction — Why Digital Communications Matter Clinically
- The changed ethical landscape for mental health practitioners
- How digital communications affect clinical outcomes
- Client expectations and treatment alliance
- Treatment mismatch and access to appropriate care
- Privacy violations and therapeutic safety
- Professional responsibility and public trust
- Overview of the four domains covered in this course
- Section 3: Part I — Understanding Multi-Layered Ethical Obligations for Digital Professional Communications
- Foundational principle: Truthfulness in all public statements
- APA Ethics Code Standards 5.01 and 5.02
- American Psychiatric Association Principles
- AAMFT Code of Ethics Standard 8.1
- NASW Code of Ethics Standard 5.02
- ACA Code of Ethics Section C.6
- Critical principle: Responsibility extends to all affiliated representations
- The “ethical oversight obligation” defined
- Who and what is covered
- Knowledge Check 1: Ethical Obligations for Public Statements (5 items)
- Section 4: Part II — Ethical Responsibilities When Accepting Roles with Mental Health Platforms and Technology Companies
- Case study: When platform promises diverge from operational reality
- Rodarte v. BetterHelp, Inc. complaint allegations (service matching, jurisdictional compliance, clinical appropriateness)
- Note on adjudication status
- Ethical implications for affiliated practitioners
- Due diligence framework before platform affiliation
- Examining how services will be publicly communicated
- Understanding business model and potential conflicts of interest
- Evaluating privacy and data protection practices
- The BetterHelp FTC enforcement action: what happened and why it matters
- Essential pre-affiliation privacy questions
- Assessing monitoring practices and artificial intelligence provisions
- Hidden AI provisions in Terms of Service
- Hypothetical scenario: discovering undisclosed AI analysis
- Critical questions about recording, transcription, and data ownership
- The Business Associate Agreement (BAA) responsibility trap
- How platforms structure BAAs to shift liability
- What practitioners must understand before signing
- Red flags in BAA review
- Knowledge Check 2: Platform Affiliation Due Diligence (5 items)
- Required Exercise 1: Platform Affiliation Due Diligence Case
- Apply the due diligence checklist to a hypothetical platform scenario
- Complete the 5-step decision framework
- Create a one-page due diligence summary
- Section 5: Part III — Hiring Third-Party Communications Contractors for Professional Digital Presence
- Contractor vetting framework
- Step 1: Evaluating healthcare communications understanding
- Step 2: Establishing review and approval processes
- Step 3: Identifying and revising problematic communication patterns
- Five problematic communication patterns with ethically defensible alternatives
- Pattern 1: Algorithmic matching claims
- Pattern 2: Outcome or success rate claims
- Pattern 3: Privacy absolutism
- Pattern 4: Timeline or session guarantees
- Pattern 5: Credential inflation
- Required Exercise 2: Rewrite Deceptive Communication Patterns
- Select at least one problematic statement
- Identify specific ethical concerns
- Write and justify an ethically defensible revision
- Clinical application vignette: The Directory Profile Dilemma
- Identifying problems in an unapproved profile
- Monday morning action steps
- Documentation note template
- Contractor vetting framework
- Section 6: Part IV — Evaluating Mental Health Applications and Digital Tools
- Practitioner responsibility to evaluate
- Research findings on mental health app privacy practices (Iwaya et al., 2023)
- Structured application assessment protocol
- Domain 1: Privacy and data security
- Domain 2: Clinical appropriateness
- Domain 3: Transparency and informed consent
- Domain 4: Business model
- When employers or insurance partners mandate applications
- Enhanced disclosure obligations
- Independent assessment requirements
- Advocacy and documentation responsibilities
- The hidden AI consent problem in apps
- Knowledge Check 3: App Evaluation (5 items)
- Clinical application vignette: The Mandated App Dilemma
- Immediate assessment steps
- Enhanced informed consent
- Advocacy with insurance panel
- Sample enhanced informed consent language
- Section 7: Part V — Creating Ethically Sound Professional Digital Presence
- Website ethics: Comprehensive compliance framework
- HIPAA technical safeguards and privacy transparency
- Note on 2024 federal court decision and HHS OCR tracking guidance
- Best practices for tracking tool disclosure
- Good Faith Estimate requirements under the No Surprises Act
- State-specific requirements
- Ethically accurate content
- Credentials and service descriptions
- Learning from platform communication failures
- Testimonials
- Business practices transparency
- Required Exercise 3: Draft Digital Informed Consent Addendum
- Platform/technology description
- Website privacy disclosures
- Communication security limitations
- Limits of confidentiality in digital contexts
- Client rights language
- Required Exercise 4: Website Tracking/Privacy Audit
- Part A: Identify tracking tools
- Part B: Privacy policy review
- Part C: Write disclosure language
- Professional directory profiles: ethical online discoverability
- Common problems
- Ethical profile practices
- Social media: education, not treatment
- Five ethical social media principles
- Boundary maintenance, transparency, client privacy, audience vulnerability
- Clinical application vignette: The Website Tracking Dilemma
- Discovery and immediate action
- Privacy policy update
- Consent mechanism implementation
- Sample updated privacy policy language
- Section 8: Part VI — Synthesizing Multiple Professional Codes
- The multi-code challenge: case example of an EMDR-trained LMFT with multiple memberships
- Multi-code compliance framework
- Step 1: Identify all applicable codes
- Step 2: Apply the strictest standard
- Step 3: Document your reasoning
- Step 4: Stay current
- Required Exercise 5: Multi-Code Compliance Mapping
- Three scenario options across licensure types
- Identify applicable codes and specific standards
- Apply strictest standard and revise problematic content
- Document decision-making rationale
- Section 9: Part VII — Practical Implementation Tools
- Tool 1: Platform Affiliation Due Diligence Checklist
- Public communications review
- Privacy and data assessment
- AI and technology evaluation
- HIPAA and legal review
- Clinical and professional autonomy
- Tool 2: Digital Informed Consent Addendum Template
- Tool 3: Mental Health App Assessment Worksheet (scored protocol, 80-point scale)
- Tool 4: Contractor Contract Essential Provisions Checklist
- Content control
- Compliance requirements
- Prohibited practices
- Termination provisions
- Tool 5: Quarterly Digital Presence Audit
- Website, directory profiles, platform affiliations, social media
- Required Exercise 6: Documentation File Setup
- Create digital ethics due diligence file structure
- Populate with at least one entry
- Tool 1: Platform Affiliation Due Diligence Checklist
- Section 10: Part VIII — When Problems Arise: Reporting and Accountability
- Recognizing when action is required
- Applicable ethical code standards for responding to violations
- APA Standards 1.04–1.05
- NASW Standard 2.11
- AAMFT Standard 1.3
- Five-step action sequence
- Document everything
- Raise concerns internally
- Protect current clients
- Consider external reporting
- Exit ethically
- External reporting resources (FTC, state licensing boards, HHS OCR, ethics committees)
- Section 11: Conclusion — Digital Professionalism and Client Protection
- Five core principles for digital practice
- Moving forward: characteristics of practitioners who thrive ethically in digital contexts
- Final summary
- Section 12: Post-Course Assessment and Completion Requirements
- 25-item multiple-choice post-test (80% passing score required)
- Required attestation of exercise completion (Item 26, unscored)
- Participant evaluation form (required for certificate issuance)
- Certificate of completion information
- Section 13: References
Instructors: Miranda Palmer, LMFT & Kelly Higdon, LMFT
Miranda Palmer, LMFT, loves helping therapists bridge the gap between what it takes to be a great therapist who gets great clinical outcomes and what it takes to run a successful therapy practice. She has helped thousands of therapists from around the world make the mindset shifts that allow a more effortless application of marketing strategies that grow a private practice that is not just financially sustainable, but also achieve great clinical outcomes.
Kelly Higdon, LMFT, believes that private practice is one of the solutions to increasing access to quality mental health in our communities. Her passion lies in empowering private practice owners to serve at their highest and best, improving clinical outcomes through their business planning and to break the statistic that mental health clinicians are the worst paid Master’s’degree. She has helped thousands through training, education and coaching.
Click here to return to Aspira Continuing Education’s Home page of CEs for Psychologists, MFTs, Social Workers, Professional Counselors, and SUDC Counselors
You may also be interested in: